Case Law & Tribunals
Livesp-08 · 14,500+ sections · 8 courts
Search UK court judgments and tribunal decisions with neutral citations. Coverage spans the Supreme Court, Court of Appeal, High Court, and specialist tribunals — all sourced from the National Archives.
30K+/yr
New Judgments
5 Courts
Coverage
Neutral Citations
Format
Weekly
Updates
About this specialist
The Case Law & Tribunals specialist searches UK court judgments and tribunal decisions, returning results with neutral citations. It covers the Supreme Court, Court of Appeal, High Court, and specialist tribunals including employment, tax, and property tribunals — all sourced from the National Archives Find Case Law service.
Every result includes the neutral citation, court name, date, and key findings. The specialist is designed for solicitors, barristers, HR professionals, and compliance officers who need to quickly locate relevant case law precedent. It chains with SP-03 (Employment Law) for legislation cross-references and SP-09 (FCA Regulation) for regulatory context.
Data Sources
4 sources · 1 Live, 3 Planned| Source | Status |
|---|---|
Find Case Law API caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk · 14,500+ sections |
Live |
Employment Tribunals gov.uk |
Planned |
Tax Tribunals gov.uk |
Planned |
Property Tribunals gov.uk |
Planned |
See it in action
Example queries the Case Law & Tribunals specialist will handle.
What did the Supreme Court decide in Uber v Aslam about worker status?
In Uber BV v Aslam [2021] UKSC 5, the Supreme Court unanimously held that Uber drivers are workers within the meaning of the Employment Rights Act 1996, not independent contractors. The Court found that Uber’s level of control over drivers — including setting fares, imposing route choices via the app, and penalising drivers who decline trips — was inconsistent with genuine self-employment.
Key finding: working time starts when the app is switched on and the driver is within their operating territory, not just when carrying passengers. This significantly affects holiday pay and NMW calculations.
[2021] UKSC 5Find recent employment tribunal decisions about whistleblowing dismissal
Here are recent employment tribunal decisions involving whistleblowing (protected disclosure) dismissals under ERA 1996, s.103A:
- Kong v Gulf International Bank [2022] EWCA Civ 941 — Court of Appeal confirmed that the disclosure must be “in the public interest” and that a genuine but mistaken belief can still qualify.
- Jesudason v Alder Hey Children’s NHS Foundation Trust [2020] EWCA Civ 73 — Detriment claims can extend to post-employment conduct.
Each case is returned with neutral citation, tribunal, date, and outcome summary.
Ready to search UK case law with AI?
Court judgments and tribunal decisions with neutral citations. Built for solicitors, barristers, and compliance teams.